Belgium’s Dividends Received Deduction Regime Tightens in 2026: Strategic Implications for Corporate Investors

23 hours ago

Belgium’s participation exemption framework — commonly referred to as the DRD (Dividends Received Deduction) — is entering a new phase. Following recent federal reforms, eligibility conditions will become more restrictive from the 2026 tax year onward.

For multinational groups, investment funds, and holding structures, these adjustments are more than a technical refinement: they may directly affect dividend taxation, capital gains treatment, and overall investment structuring.

This article outlines the upcoming changes, explains their operational consequences, and highlights key considerations for cross-border investors navigating increasingly complex tax environments.

Why the DRD Regime Matters in Corporate Structuring

Belgium’s DRD system is designed to prevent economic double taxation on distributed profits. In practice, it allows qualifying companies to exclude certain dividends received from subsidiaries from their taxable base.

The regime is central to Belgium’s attractiveness as a holding location. Without it, corporate groups could face taxation multiple times on the same income stream as profits move up the ownership chain.

Beyond dividends, the same core conditions generally influence the tax treatment of capital gains on shares, making the DRD framework a cornerstone of corporate tax planning.

The Traditional Eligibility Criteria — A Quick Reminder

To qualify for the DRD deduction under the existing framework, three main criteria must be met:

1. Participation Requirement

A company must either:

  • Hold at least 10% of the distributing company’s capital, or
  • Maintain a participation with an acquisition value of at least €2.5 million.

2. Minimum Holding Period

Shares must be held continuously for a minimum of one year in full ownership.

3. Subject-to-Tax Condition

The distributing entity must be subject to a tax regime comparable to Belgian corporate taxation standards.

These conditions also shape eligibility for exemptions on capital gains realized on qualifying shares.

What Will Change From the 2026 Assessment Year?

The reform keeps the 10% ownership threshold unchanged, but introduces an additional requirement for certain large corporate shareholders relying on the €2.5 million alternative threshold.

A New Constraint for Minority Stakes in Large Groups

Companies that:

  • Hold less than 10% of a subsidiary, and
  • Rely on the €2.5 million acquisition value test,

will now face an extra qualification test — unless they qualify as small enterprises.

Specifically, the participation must be recognized as a financial fixed asset at the time dividends are paid or made available. This classification effectively requires evidence of a long-term strategic investment, rather than a purely financial or short-term portfolio holding.

Practical Interpretation: What Authorities Are Likely Looking For

The new rule introduces a more substance-based evaluation of minority participations in large groups. In practical terms, taxpayers may need to demonstrate:

  • A durable economic relationship between parent and subsidiary
  • A long-term investment horizon
  • Integration into broader group strategy rather than passive trading intent

Accounting classification will therefore become more than a technical exercise — it may determine whether dividends remain exempt.

Timeline and Transitional Considerations

The new rules apply starting with the 2026 assessment year, meaning they affect financial years beginning on or after January 1, 2025.

Companies should anticipate potential impacts when:

  • Planning dividend distributions
  • Reviewing advance corporate tax payments
  • Evaluating portfolio structures before year-end

Early analysis is particularly important for multinational groups managing minority holdings across multiple jurisdictions.

Strategic Impact for Institutional Investors and Cross-Border Structures

Although the reform targets corporate taxation, it intersects with broader themes shaping the European tax landscape:

  • Increased scrutiny on substance and economic purpose
  • Reduced tolerance for passive or purely financial holding structures
  • Alignment with international anti-avoidance frameworks

For asset managers, funds, and holding companies, the new requirement may trigger a reassessment of:

  • Minority equity investments
  • Accounting treatment of participations
  • Cross-border dividend flows and reclaim strategies

The Broader Context: Managing Tax Leakage in a Changing Environment

As national regimes tighten eligibility rules and tax authorities increase scrutiny, optimizing post-tax returns becomes increasingly complex. Dividend exemptions, withholding taxes, reclaim procedures, and treaty relief mechanisms are now deeply interconnected.

Specialized partners — such as Globe Refund
— help institutional investors, funds, and financial institutions identify reclaim opportunities and mitigate unnecessary tax leakage through fully outsourced recovery solutions and continuous monitoring processes. 

In a context where legislative adjustments can quickly alter eligibility criteria or cash-flow assumptions, proactive tax management becomes a core component of investment performance.

Key Takeaways for 2026 and Beyond

  • Belgium’s DRD framework remains intact but introduces stricter conditions for certain minority participations.
  • Large companies relying on the €2.5 million participation test must ensure their investments qualify as long-term financial fixed assets.
  • The reform applies to financial years beginning in 2025, impacting the 2026 assessment year.
  • Corporate groups should reassess accounting classifications, dividend planning, and minority stake strategies ahead of implementation.